The impact of the post- COVID 19 pandemic elective waiting list delays on patient reported symptoms and intention to proceed with planned upper limb surgeries-A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient reported outcome measures using the EQ5D-5L and EQ5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) following elective shoulder and elbow orthopaedic list delays. This was further correlated with patients' intention to proceed with the planned surgery. METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for more than 26 weeks were included in the study. Telephone interviews were conducted utilising the EQ5D-5L and the EQ5D-5L VAS at the time of addition to the waiting list and presently. RESULTS: 75 out of 324 screened patients were eligible. 62 (82.7%) patients still wanted to proceed with their planned procedure while 13 (17.3%) patients in the other group no longer wanted to proceed. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean age, gender, initial trial of conservative treatment and limb laterality between these groups (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean duration of being on the waiting list between these groups (40.4 ± 19 vs. 62.9 ± 17.5 weeks respectively). Furthermore, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the current EQ5D-5L VAS scores were observed between these groups (52.4 vs. 65.8 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that majority of patients on elective shoulder and elbow orthopaedic lists with prolonged waiting list delays and improved EQ5D-5L scores are likely to decline the planned procedure and vice versa. Nevertheless, the unplanned 'watchful waiting' caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and leading to patients deciding to decline surgery, is not a substitute for timely planned surgery to alleviate patients' suffering.

Assessment of Virtual Peer Learning by Peer Feedback: A Pilot Project.

Introduction Virtual learning has become the preferred modality for health education during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Peer learning is gaining a lot of significance lately and has been successfully tested in various settings. We combined virtual delivery of health education with peer-assisted learning and evaluated the effectiveness using peer-generated feedback and tested the effectiveness of the model for different cohorts. Methods We performed this study as part of a formal educational course on Health Professions Education. The educators were volunteers from different informal multi-disciplinary groups, working in varied healthcare settings, globally. This involved eight teaching sessions which were delivered virtually and the feedback was recorded as responses to six items (questions), which the learners graded on the Likert scale. The average for each item and the larger domains was then calculated and analyzed.  Results The feedback was provided by all the participants (53/53). In the feedback received item-wise, the best average rating was for legibility of the slides (4.8). The least rating was for adequate checking and assessment of prior knowledge (4.2). In terms of the broader domains, the best feedback was for the teaching material (4.6) and the lowest was for the planning of the sessions (4.4). Overall, the ratings for the domains and the items were above 3 on a scale of 1-5. Conclusions Virtual delivery of healthcare education, facilitated by peer-assisted learning, is an effective model for health education when delivered for a small group, as evidenced by the overall peer feedback. This model can be tested for larger cohorts in the future.

The Efficacy of Pre-Operative Self-Isolation Guidelines for Safe Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Objectives This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the self-isolation guidance for elective orthopaedic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between patient compliance with the self-isolation guidance and the resulting COVID-19 status. This would give planning strategies for managing elective orthopaedic lists. Method For the study, 110 patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgical procedures during a one-month period were identified. Patients scheduled for surgery were asked to take a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test three days prior to surgery and they were asked to follow the self-isolation guidance. On the day of admission, patients declared compliance with self-isolation regulations. Admission was refused in cases of non-compliance. After discharge, telephone calls were made to patients to determine the degree of compliance with the self-isolation guidance. Results Overall, 106 out of 107 patients that were compliant with the self-isolation guidance tested negative for COVID-19; 15 patients had their operation cancelled over the one-month period; of which one-third were cancelled by the patients themselves. Three patients were found to be non-compliant with the self-isolation guidance. Of these three non-compliant patients, one tested positive for COVID-19. Adherence to the self-isolation guidelines helped to prevent last-minute cancellations and manage the list effectively. Conclusions Compliance with our self-isolation guidance accompanied by PCR screening minimises the risk of testing positive for COVID-19 and is thus an effective system to safely perform elective orthopaedic surgery. Intentionally overbooking theatre lists by 10 to 12.5% may account for cancellations and improve theatre efficiencies during post-pandemic recovery plans for elective orthopaedic surgeries.

How Effective Are Telephone and Video Consultations in Shoulder and Elbow Clinics? Analysis Using an Objective Scoring Tool.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in disruptions of clinical services, which saw more clinics being conducted as telephone and videos. The study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of consultations, that is, telephone, video, and face-to-face (F2F) in a shoulder and elbow clinic. METHODS: A total of 84 clinic letters from a shoulder and elbow clinic at a district general hospital were analysed using the Ashford Clinic Letter Scoring System. Of these, 30 were F2F, 30 were telephone, and 24 were video consultations. The letters were analysed and scored based on four parameters, that is, whether a working diagnosis was formulated, relevant investigations were requested or available, a clear management plan was formulated, and whether the consultation was deemed valuable by both the clinician and patient. RESULTS: The mean score (out of a total possible of eight) for F2F was 7.967, 7.667 for video, and 7.333 for telephone consultations. Amongst new referrals, F2F performed the best, followed by video with telephone consultations scoring the lowest. With follow-up referrals, the performance of telephone and video consultations was similar but more inferior compared to F2F. Videos performed nearly as well as F2F when it came to formulating treatment plans for patients.  Conclusion: F2F consultations remain the gold standard in a shoulder and elbow clinic; however, careful stratification of patients into video, telephone, and F2F clinics can help in optimal delivery of care. These findings can be applied to other surgical specialties and medicine in general. Virtual clinics are viable and potentially cost-effective options to the traditional F2F.

Hospital transmission rates of the SARS-CoV 2 disease amongst orthopaedic in-patients in a secondary care centre: A quantitative review.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic practice changed during COVID-19 with elective work ceasing, trauma reducing and work forces redistributed to medical areas. During the United Kingdom lockdown, hospitals were stretched thinly with admissions of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. AIM: Evaluate orthopaedic admissions to a district general hospital during lockdown and the volume of those who subsequently were found to be COVID-19 positive. METHOD: Retrospective study of patients admitted under trauma and orthopaedics between March 23, 2020-June 18, 2020. Data includes; diagnosis, COVID-19 swab dates, results and mortality using orthopaedic admission sheets, patient and pathology electronic recording system. RESULTS: 3/4 of admitted patients tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 initially. Of these 240 patients, 12.5% subsequently tested positive during their stay, often within one week of their admission. 17.8% of patients were never tested. 7.8% mortality rate of which 48% were neck of femur fracture (NOF#) patients. 28 NOF# were confirmed COVID-19 positive; mortality rate of 21.4%. 87 NOF# were COVID-19 negative; mortality rate 6.9%. Mortality relative risk (RR) for NOF# and COVID-19 positive was 2.6. COVID-19 positive mortality 27% as compared to 4% in COVID-19 negative patients. Patients who acquired COVID-19 whilst in hospital had a mortality relative risk 6.4. CONCLUSION: 12.5% orthopaedic in-hospital viral transmission rate amongst orthopaedic patients despite the segregation measures taken, possibly due to asymptomatic health care workers or inpatients awaiting swab results. We emphasize the importance of testing all inpatients and regular testing of healthcare workers.

COVID-19 - Changes in the presentation and management of shoulder and elbow trauma in a UK district general hospital orthopaedic department.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on healthcare systems. We aim to quantify the impact of this outbreak on shoulder and elbow trauma in our institution. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on patients presenting to our hospital with shoulder and elbow injuries during COVID-19. This included the number of attendances to the emergency department, fracture clinic, inpatient admissions and operative treatments. This was compared to a pre-COVID-19 period. We also assessed the efficacy of telephone clinics. RESULTS: There has been a noticeable decrease in the number of emergency department and fracture clinic attendances with upper limb complaints. The number of in-person fracture clinic reviews also decreased, with a reciprocal exponential increase in telephone consultations. We recorded a decrease in the number of shoulder and elbow trauma procedures performed. There was a small increase in the proportion of injuries treated conservatively during COVID-19. Our telephone clinics yielded a diagnosis and management plan in many cases and patient perspective appeared favourable. CONCLUSION: We have noted significant change in the upper limb caseload. Certain injuries have reduced, likely due to COVID-19 lockdown. Moreover, we consider several changes to current practices could be taken forward after the pandemic.

Change in practice due to COVID-19 - Early experiences of a United Kingdom district general hospital in trauma & orthopaedics.

COVID-19 is a significant worldwide challenge to many healthcare systems. In Trauma and Orthopaedics, there has been a significant change in the workload but departments have been compelled to change their practice in order to match the demand, as well as respond to the escalating situation of COVID. Some guidance is available on these changes from bodies such as the National Health Service (NHS), Public Health England and the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA). We have implemented certain changes in our university district general hospital trauma and orthopaedic department with regard to staff roles, outpatient and inpatient care and operative protocols. We aim to present some of these changes and their effects on patient care in an attempt to share these with colleagues who may face similar pressures and make some recommendations to help others prepare for a possible second wave of COVID-19.